Art pop and experimental for instance mean very similar things therefore there's no point in listing both.
Same goes from psychedelic rock, psychedelic pop, and space rock.
This article is within the scope of Wiki Project Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres.
If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
It's pretty obvious that a Cyrus fan just recently added every positive review they could find into the critical reception section and, given the fact that most reviews pertaining to this album have been mixed or negative, the critical reception is extremely lopsided in favor of Cyrus.
Someone needs to go through and weed out the excess positive reviews and present a more accurate representation of the album's reception by adding some of the mixed reviews that make up a majority of the response.
This is an inappropriate phenomenon and should be reverted when seen.
Reece Leonard (talk) , 8 September 2015 (UTC) The amount of genres listed for this album is excessive as hell and overlap (I mean there's 6 and most relate to being psychedelic.) There's no way we need more than 3 genres listed here, now which 3 are the most appropriate? Mrmoustache14 (talk) , 6 September 2015 (UTC) While they're all sourced it's both an eyesore and redundant.
Visit our project page if you're interested in joining!
If you have questions, please direct them to our talk page.
Reece Leonard (talk) , 7 September 2015 (UTC) A third issue: The album is currently listed as having received 58 on Metacritic, signifying mixed reviews.
Furthermore, a majority of the reviews listed are mixed.
Reece Leonard (talk) , 5 September 2015 (UTC) Further point: this section is also completely unorganized.